forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
block cfq: select new workload if priority changed
If priority is changed, continuing to check workload_expires and service tree count of the previous workload does not make sense. We should always choose the workload with lowest key of new priority in such case. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
760701bfe1
commit
e4ea0c16a8
|
@ -2101,6 +2101,7 @@ static void choose_service_tree(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_group *cfqg)
|
|||
unsigned count;
|
||||
struct cfq_rb_root *st;
|
||||
unsigned group_slice;
|
||||
enum wl_prio_t original_prio = cfqd->serving_prio;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!cfqg) {
|
||||
cfqd->serving_prio = IDLE_WORKLOAD;
|
||||
|
@ -2119,6 +2120,9 @@ static void choose_service_tree(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_group *cfqg)
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (original_prio != cfqd->serving_prio)
|
||||
goto new_workload;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For RT and BE, we have to choose also the type
|
||||
* (SYNC, SYNC_NOIDLE, ASYNC), and to compute a workload
|
||||
|
@ -2133,6 +2137,7 @@ static void choose_service_tree(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_group *cfqg)
|
|||
if (count && !time_after(jiffies, cfqd->workload_expires))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
new_workload:
|
||||
/* otherwise select new workload type */
|
||||
cfqd->serving_type =
|
||||
cfq_choose_wl(cfqd, cfqg, cfqd->serving_prio);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user