forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
[PATCH] um: fix confusion irq early reenabling
Fix confusion about call context - comments and code are inconsistent and plain wrong, my fault. Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Acked-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b53378856f
commit
ec0ac8ad33
@ -370,10 +370,10 @@ static irqreturn_t line_write_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
|
||||
struct tty_struct *tty = line->tty;
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Interrupts are enabled here because we registered the interrupt with
|
||||
/* Interrupts are disabled here because we registered the interrupt with
|
||||
* IRQF_DISABLED (see line_setup_irq).*/
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&line->lock);
|
||||
spin_lock(&line->lock);
|
||||
err = flush_buffer(line);
|
||||
if (err == 0) {
|
||||
return IRQ_NONE;
|
||||
@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static irqreturn_t line_write_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
|
||||
line->head = line->buffer;
|
||||
line->tail = line->buffer;
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&line->lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&line->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if(tty == NULL)
|
||||
return IRQ_NONE;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user