forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
x86: use X86_FEATURE_NOPL in alternatives
Use X86_FEATURE_NOPL to determine if it is safe to use P6 NOPs in alternatives. Also, replace table and loop with simple if statement. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7e00df5818
commit
f1c5d30e1d
@ -145,35 +145,25 @@ static const unsigned char *const p6_nops[ASM_NOP_MAX+1] = {
|
||||
extern char __vsyscall_0;
|
||||
const unsigned char *const *find_nop_table(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL ||
|
||||
boot_cpu_data.x86 < 6 ? k8_nops : p6_nops;
|
||||
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL &&
|
||||
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NOPL))
|
||||
return p6_nops;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return k8_nops;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#else /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct nop {
|
||||
int cpuid;
|
||||
const unsigned char *const *noptable;
|
||||
} noptypes[] = {
|
||||
{ X86_FEATURE_K8, k8_nops },
|
||||
{ X86_FEATURE_K7, k7_nops },
|
||||
{ X86_FEATURE_P4, p6_nops },
|
||||
{ X86_FEATURE_P3, p6_nops },
|
||||
{ -1, NULL }
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const unsigned char *const *find_nop_table(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const unsigned char *const *noptable = intel_nops;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; noptypes[i].cpuid >= 0; i++) {
|
||||
if (boot_cpu_has(noptypes[i].cpuid)) {
|
||||
noptable = noptypes[i].noptable;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return noptable;
|
||||
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_K8))
|
||||
return k8_nops;
|
||||
else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_K7))
|
||||
return k7_nops;
|
||||
else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NOPL))
|
||||
return p6_nops;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return intel_nops;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user