forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
NLM: Clean up nlmsvc_grant_reply locking
Slightly simpler logic here makes it more trivial to verify that the up's and down's are balanced here. Break out an assignment from a conditional while we're at it. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fb459f45f7
commit
f232142cc2
|
@ -637,11 +637,12 @@ nlmsvc_grant_reply(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_cookie *cookie, u32 status
|
|||
|
||||
file->f_count++;
|
||||
down(&file->f_sema);
|
||||
if ((block = nlmsvc_find_block(cookie,&rqstp->rq_addr)) != NULL) {
|
||||
block = nlmsvc_find_block(cookie, &rqstp->rq_addr);
|
||||
if (block) {
|
||||
if (status == NLM_LCK_DENIED_GRACE_PERIOD) {
|
||||
/* Try again in a couple of seconds */
|
||||
nlmsvc_insert_block(block, 10 * HZ);
|
||||
block = NULL;
|
||||
up(&file->f_sema);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* Lock is now held by client, or has been rejected.
|
||||
* In both cases, the block should be removed. */
|
||||
|
@ -652,8 +653,6 @@ nlmsvc_grant_reply(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_cookie *cookie, u32 status
|
|||
nlmsvc_delete_block(block, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!block)
|
||||
up(&file->f_sema);
|
||||
nlm_release_file(file);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user