forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
dax, pmem: Add a dax operation zero_page_range
Add a dax operation zero_page_range, to zero a page. This will also clear any known poison in the page being zeroed. As of now, zeroing of one page is allowed in a single call. There are no callers which are trying to zero more than a page in a single call. Once we grow the callers which zero more than a page in single call, we can add that support. Primary reason for not doing that yet is that this will add little complexity in dm implementation where a range might be spanning multiple underlying targets and one will have to split the range into multiple sub ranges and call zero_page_range() on individual targets. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200228163456.1587-3-vgoyal@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5d64efe797
commit
f605a263e0
|
@ -344,6 +344,26 @@ size_t dax_copy_to_iter(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff, void *addr,
|
|||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_copy_to_iter);
|
||||
|
||||
int dax_zero_page_range(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff,
|
||||
size_t nr_pages)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!dax_alive(dax_dev))
|
||||
return -ENXIO;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!dax_dev->ops->zero_page_range)
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* There are no callers that want to zero more than one page as of now.
|
||||
* Once users are there, this check can be removed after the
|
||||
* device mapper code has been updated to split ranges across targets.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (nr_pages != 1)
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
|
||||
return dax_dev->ops->zero_page_range(dax_dev, pgoff, nr_pages);
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_zero_page_range);
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API
|
||||
void arch_wb_cache_pmem(void *addr, size_t size);
|
||||
void dax_flush(struct dax_device *dax_dev, void *addr, size_t size)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -282,6 +282,16 @@ static const struct block_device_operations pmem_fops = {
|
|||
.revalidate_disk = nvdimm_revalidate_disk,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static int pmem_dax_zero_page_range(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff,
|
||||
size_t nr_pages)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct pmem_device *pmem = dax_get_private(dax_dev);
|
||||
|
||||
return blk_status_to_errno(pmem_do_write(pmem, ZERO_PAGE(0), 0,
|
||||
PFN_PHYS(pgoff) >> SECTOR_SHIFT,
|
||||
PAGE_SIZE));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static long pmem_dax_direct_access(struct dax_device *dax_dev,
|
||||
pgoff_t pgoff, long nr_pages, void **kaddr, pfn_t *pfn)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -313,6 +323,7 @@ static const struct dax_operations pmem_dax_ops = {
|
|||
.dax_supported = generic_fsdax_supported,
|
||||
.copy_from_iter = pmem_copy_from_iter,
|
||||
.copy_to_iter = pmem_copy_to_iter,
|
||||
.zero_page_range = pmem_dax_zero_page_range,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct attribute_group *pmem_attribute_groups[] = {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ struct dax_operations {
|
|||
/* copy_to_iter: required operation for fs-dax direct-i/o */
|
||||
size_t (*copy_to_iter)(struct dax_device *, pgoff_t, void *, size_t,
|
||||
struct iov_iter *);
|
||||
/* zero_page_range: required operation. Zero page range */
|
||||
int (*zero_page_range)(struct dax_device *, pgoff_t, size_t);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
extern struct attribute_group dax_attribute_group;
|
||||
|
@ -199,6 +201,8 @@ size_t dax_copy_from_iter(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff, void *addr,
|
|||
size_t bytes, struct iov_iter *i);
|
||||
size_t dax_copy_to_iter(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff, void *addr,
|
||||
size_t bytes, struct iov_iter *i);
|
||||
int dax_zero_page_range(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff,
|
||||
size_t nr_pages);
|
||||
void dax_flush(struct dax_device *dax_dev, void *addr, size_t size);
|
||||
|
||||
ssize_t dax_iomap_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user