forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
lockdep: Fix preemption WARN for spurious IRQ-enable
It is valid (albeit uncommon) to call local_irq_enable() without first
having called local_irq_disable(). In this case we enter
lockdep_hardirqs_on*() with IRQs enabled and trip a preemption warning
for using __this_cpu_read().
Use this_cpu_read() instead to avoid the warning.
Fixes: 4d004099a6
("lockdep: Fix lockdep recursion")
Reported-by: syzbot+53f8ce8bbc07924b6417@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ed3e453798
commit
f8e48a3dca
|
@ -4057,7 +4057,7 @@ void lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(unsigned long ip)
|
|||
if (unlikely(in_nmi()))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(__this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
|
||||
if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())) {
|
||||
|
@ -4126,7 +4126,7 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigned long ip)
|
|||
goto skip_checks;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(__this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
|
||||
if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (lockdep_hardirqs_enabled()) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user