The more aggressive forward-progress tests can interfere with rcutorture
shutdown, resulting in false-positive diagnostics. This commit therefore
ends any such tests 30 seconds prior to shutdown.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
During an actual call_rcu() flood, there would be frequent trips to
userspace (in-kernel call_rcu() floods must be otherwise housebroken).
Userspace execution allows a great many things to interrupt execution,
and rcutorture needs to also allow such interruptions. This commit
therefore causes call_rcu() floods to occasionally invoke schedule(),
thus preventing spurious rcutorture failures due to other parts of the
kernel becoming irate at the call_rcu() flood events.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Various security techniques can obfuscate pointer printouts on the
console. Unfortunately, rcutorture relies on either "null" or all zeroes
to identify the last few statistics printouts at the end of the test.
These need to be identified because failing to do so will results in
false-positive complaints about grace-period hangs.
This commit therefore prints the "ver:" in capitals ("VER:") when
the RCU-protected pointer has been set to NULL, which causes rcutorture's
parse-console.sh script to correctly ignore these lines.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
I have been showing off a trivial RCU implementation for non-preemptive
environments for some time now:
#define rcu_read_lock()
#define rcu_read_unlock()
#define rcu_dereference(p) READ_ONCE(p)
#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) smp_store_release(&(p), (v))
void synchronize_rcu(void)
{
int cpu;
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
sched_setaffinity(current->pid, cpumask_of(cpu));
}
Trivial or not, as the old saying goes, "if it ain't tested, it don't
work!". This commit therefore adds a "trivial" flavor to rcutorture
and a corresponding TRIVIAL test scenario. This variant does not handle
CPU hotplug, which is unconditionally enabled on x86 for post-v5.1-rc3
kernels, which is why the TRIVIAL.boot says "rcutorture.onoff_interval=0".
This commit actually does handle CONFIG_PREEMPT=y kernels, but only
because it turns back the Linux-kernel clock in order to provide these
alternative definitions (or the moral equivalent thereof):
#define rcu_read_lock() preempt_disable()
#define rcu_read_unlock() preempt_enable()
In CONFIG_PREEMPT=n kernels without debugging, these are equivalent to
empty macros give or take a compiler barrier. However, the have been
successfully tested with actual empty macros as well.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
[ paulmck: Fix symbol issue reported by kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>. ]
[ paulmck: Work around sched_setaffinity() issue noted by Andrea Parri. ]
[ paulmck: Add rcutorture.shuffle_interval=0 to TRIVIAL.boot to fix
interaction with shuffler task noted by Peter Zijlstra. ]
Tested-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
Once removed, an rcu_torture element can be deferred-freed by a chain
of call_rcu() invocations, with each callback invoking another round of
call_rcu() until either a fixed number of call_rcu() invocations have
been chained or until the test ends. This means that if the test ends,
some of the rcu_torture elements will be "stranded" partway through the
deferred-free process, which results in false-positive warnings from
rcu_torture_writer() due to lack of forward progress should the test
end just at the end of a stutter interval.
This commit therefore suppresses rcu_torture_writer()'s forward-progress
checks when the test ends in order to avoid these false-positive reports..
Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
In !PREEMPT kernels, cond_resched() is a no-op. In NO_HZ_FULL kernels,
in-kernel execution (such as that of rcutorture's kthreads) might extend
indefinitely without the scheduler gaining the aid of a scheduling-clock
interrupt. This combination can make the interaction of an rcutorture
forward-progress test and a CPU-hotplug stop_machine operation make less
forward progress than one might like. Additionally, Sebastian Siewior
notes that NO_HZ_FULL kernels have a scheduler check upon return to
userspace execution, which suggests that in-kernel emulation of tight
userspace loops containing system calls doing call_rcu() might also need
explicit checks in the PREEMPT && NO_HZ_FULL case.
This commit therefore introduces a rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cond_resched()
function that explicitly invokes schedule() in such kernels whenever
need_resched() returns true, while retaining use of cond_resched()
for kernels that are either !PREEMPT or !NO_HZ_FULL.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
After the end of each stutter pause interval, the rcu_torture_writer()
kthread checks to be sure that all prior callbacks have completed so
that all the test structures have been freed. This works fine except
for tasks RCU, in which grace periods can take one good long time.
This commit therefore exempts tasks RCU from this check.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Currently, the inter-stutter interval is the same as the stutter duration,
that is, whatever number of jiffies is passed into torture_stutter_init().
This has worked well for quite some time, but the addition of
forward-progress testing to rcutorture can delay processes for several
seconds, which can triple the time that they are stuttered.
This commit therefore adds a second argument to torture_stutter_init()
that specifies the inter-stutter interval. While locktorture preserves
the current behavior, rcutorture uses the RCU CPU stall warning interval
to provide a wider inter-stutter interval.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
The stutter_wait() function is supposed to return true if it actually
waits and false otherwise, but it instead unconditionally returns false.
Which hides a bug in rcu_torture_writer() that fails to account for
the fact that one of the rcu_tortures[] array elements will normally be
referenced by rcu_torture_current, and thus not be on the freelist.
This commit therefore corrects the stutter_wait() return value and adds a
check for rcu_torture_current to rcu_torture_writer()'s check that things
get freed after everything goes quiescent. In addition, this commit
causes torture_stutter() to give a bit more than one second (instead of
only one jiffy) warning of the end of the stutter interval. Finally,
this commit disables long-delay readers and aggressive update-side
forward-progress checks while forward-progress testing is in flight.
Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
The rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cbfree() function frees callbacks used during
rcutorture's call_rcu() forward-progress test, but does so in a tight
loop. This could cause problems given a very long list of callbacks to be
freed, and actual testing produces lists with as many as 25M callbacks.
This commit therefore adds a cond_resched() to this loop. While in
the area, this commit also rearranges the lock releases to look a bit
more sane.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
If the specified rcutorture.torture_type is not in the rcu_torture_init()
function's torture_ops[] array, rcutorture prints some console messages
and then invokes rcu_torture_cleanup() to set state so that a future
torture test can run. However, rcu_torture_cleanup() also attempts to
end the test that didn't actually start, and in doing so relies on the
value of cur_ops, a value that is not particularly relevant in this case.
This can result in confusing output or even follow-on failures due to
attempts to use facilities that have not been properly initialized.
This commit therefore sets the value of cur_ops to NULL in this case
and inserts a check near the beginning of rcu_torture_cleanup(),
thus avoiding relying on an irrelevant cur_ops value.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
The rcutorture_oom_notify() function has a misplaced close parenthesis
that results in increasingly long delays in rcu_fwd_progress_check()'s
checking for various RCU forward-progress problems. This commit therefore
puts the parenthesis in the right place.
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Back when there was a separate RCU-bh flavor, the ->ext_irq_conflict
field was used to prevent executing local_bh_enable() while interrupts
were disabled. However, there is no longer an RCU-bh flavor, so this
commit removes the no-longer-needed ->ext_irq_conflict field.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
The code actually rarely uses more than one type of RCU read-side
protection, as is actually desired given that we need some reasonable
probability of preempting RCU read-side critical sections, which cannot
happen with multiple types of protection. This comment therefore adjusts
the comment.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
The cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() function was added because NVME
used WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueues and SRCU did not, which meant that
NVME workqueues waiting on SRCU workqueues could result in deadlocks
during low-memory conditions. However, SRCU now also has WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
workqueues, so there is no longer a potential for deadlock. Furthermore,
it turns out to be extremely hard to use cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced()
correctly due to the fact that SRCU callback invocation accesses the
srcu_struct structure's per-CPU data area just after callbacks are
invoked. Therefore, the usual practice of using srcu_barrier() to wait
for callbacks to be invoked before invoking cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced()
fails because SRCU's callback-invocation workqueue handler might be
delayed, which can result in cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() being invoked
(and thus freeing the per-CPU data) before the SRCU's callback-invocation
workqueue handler is finished using that per-CPU data. Nor is this a
theoretical problem: KASAN emitted use-after-free warnings because of
this problem on actual runs.
In short, NVME can now safely invoke cleanup_srcu_struct(), which
avoids the use-after-free scenario. And cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced()
is quite difficult to use safely. This commit therefore removes
cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced(), switching its sole user back to
cleanup_srcu_struct(). This effectively reverts the following pair
of commits:
f7194ac32c ("srcu: Add cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced()")
4317228ad9 ("nvme: Avoid flush dependency in delete controller flow")
Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Replace the license boiler plate with a SPDX license identifier.
While in the area, update an email address.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Beyond a certain point in the CPU-hotplug offline process, timers get
stranded on the outgoing CPU, and won't fire until that CPU comes back
online, which might well be never. This commit therefore adds a hook
in torture_onoff_init() that is invoked from torture_offline(), which
rcutorture uses to occasionally wait for a grace period. This should
result in failures for RCU implementations that rely on stranded timers
eventually firing in the absence of the CPU coming back online.
Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
This commit records grace periods in rcutorture's n_launders_hist[]
histogram, thus allowing rcu_torture_fwd_cb_hist() to print out the
elapsed number of grace periods between buckets. This information
helps to determine whether a lack of forward progress is due to stalled
grace periods on the one hand or due to sluggish callback invocation on
the other.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
The "busted" rcutorture type is an intentionally broken implementation
of RCU. Doing forward-progress testing on this implementation is not
particularly meaningful on the one hand and can result in fatal abuse
of the memory allocator on the other. This commit therefore disables
forward-progress testing of the "busted" rcutorture type.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
This commit narrows the scope of each bucket of the forward-progress
callback-invocation histograms from one second to 100 milliseconds, which
aids debugging of forward-progress problems by making shorter-duration
callback-invocation stalls visible.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
This commit causes the OOM handler to do rcu_barrier() calls and to
free up forward-progress callbacks in order to recover from OOM events.
The current test is terminated, but subsequent forward-progress tests can
proceed. This allows a long test to result in multiple forward-progress
failures, greatly reducing the required testing time.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
This commit prints the age of the forward-progress test in jiffies,
in order to allow better interpretation of the callback-invocation
histograms.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
One reason why a forward-progress test might fail would be if something
prevented or delayed callback invocation. This commit therefore adds a
callback-invocation histogram printout when OOM is reported to rcutorture.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
This commit adds an OOM notifier during rcutorture forward-progress
testing. If this notifier is invoked, it dumps out some grace-period
state to help debug the forward-progress problem.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Because rcutorture's forward-progress checking will trigger from an
OOM notifier, this notifier will introduce asynchronous concurrent
access to the rcu_fwd_startat variable. This commit therefore prepares
for this by converting updates to WRITE_ONCE().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
This commit affinities the forward-progress tests to avoid hogging a
housekeeping CPU on the theory that the offloaded callbacks will be
running on those housekeeping CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
[ paulmck: Fix NULL-pointer issue located by kbuild test robot. ]
Tested-by: Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
This commit splits rcu_torture_fwd_prog_nr() and rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cr()
functions out of rcu_torture_fwd_prog() in order to reduce indentation
pain and because rcu_torture_fwd_prog() was getting a bit too long.
In addition, this will enable easier conditional execution of the
rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cr() function, which can give false-positive
failures in some NO_HZ_FULL configurations due to overloading the
housekeeping CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Now that the forward-progress code does a full-bore continuous callback
flood lasting multiple seconds, there is little point in also posting a
mere 60,000 callbacks every second or so. This commit therefore removes
the old cbflood testing. Over time, it may be desirable to concurrently
do full-bore continuous callback floods on all CPUs simultaneously, but
one dragon at a time.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit adds a call_rcu() flooding loop to the forward-progress test.
This emulates tight userspace loops that force call_rcu() invocations,
for example, the infamous loop containing close(open()) that instigated
the addition of blimit. If RCU does not make sufficient forward progress
in invoking the resulting flood of callbacks, rcutorture emits a warning.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Now that RCU can have readers with multiple segments, it is quite
possible that a specific sequence of reader segments might result in
an rcutorture failure (reader spans a full grace period as detected
by one of the grace-period primitives) or an rcutorture close call
(reader potentially spans a full grace period based on reading out
the RCU implementation's grace-period counter, but with no ordering).
In such cases, it would clearly ease debugging if the offending specific
sequence was known. For the first reader encountering a failure or a
close call, this commit therefore dumps out the segments, delay durations,
and whether or not the reader was preempted.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ paulmck: Mark variables static, as suggested by kbuild test robot. ]
Now that the RCU-bh and RCU-sched update-side functions are simple
wrappers around their RCU counterparts, there isn't a whole lot of point
in testing them. This commit therefore removes the "rcu_bh" and "sched"
torture types from rcutorture.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Since there is now a single consolidated RCU flavor, rcutorture
needs to test extending of RCU readers via rcu_read_lock_bh() and
rcu_read_lock_sched(). This commit adds this support, with added checks
(just like for local_bh_enable()) to ensure that rcu_read_unlock_bh()
will not be invoked while interrupts are disabled.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit makes the "rcu" torture type test extended read-side
critical sections in order to test the deferral of RCU-preempt
quiescent-state testing.
In CONFIG_PREEMPT=n kernels, this simply duplicates the setup already
in place for the "sched" torture type.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The current forward-progress testing maintains a self-propagating
callback during the full test. This could result in false negatives
for stutter-end checking, where it might appear that RCU was clearing
out old callbacks only because it was being continually motivated by
the self-propagating callback. This commit therefore shuts down the
self-propagating callback at the end of each forward-progress test
interval.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The rcu_torture_writer() function invokes stutter_wait() at the end of
each writer pass, which occasionally blocks for an extended time period
in order to ensure that RCU can handle intermittent loads. But part of
handling a busy period is invoking all the callbacks before the end of
the idle period induced by stutter_wait().
This commit therefore adds a return value to stutter_wait() indicating
whether stutter_wait() actually waited. In addition, this commit causes
rcu_torture_writer() to test this value and if set, checks that all the
elements of the rcu_tortures[] array have been freed up.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit prints the duration of the forward-progress test interval in
the case that no forward progress was observed as an aid to debugging.
When forward progress does happen, it prints out the number of
rcu_torture_writer() versions and grace periods that elapsed during the
forward-progress test. At the end of the run, it also prints the number
of attempted and actual forward-progress tests.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Currently, rcutorture provisions rcu_torture_reader() kthreads based
on the initial number of CPUs. This can be problematic when CPU hotplug
is enabled, as a system with a very large number of CPUs will provision
a very large number of rcu_torture_reader() kthreads. All of these
kthreads will continue running even if the CPU-hotplug operations result
in only one remaining online CPU. This can result in all sorts of strange
artifacts due simply to massive overload.
This commit therefore causes the rcu_torture_reader() kthreads to start
blocking as the number of online CPUs decreases. This is accomplished
by numbering these kthreads, and having each check to make sure that the
number of online CPUs is at least as large as its assigned number.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On !SMP tests, the forward-progress kthread might prevent RCU's
grace-period kthread from running, which would defeat RCU's
forward-progress measures. On PREEMPT tests without RCU priority
boosting, the forward-progress kthread might preempt a reader for an
extended time period, which would also defeat RCU's forward-progress
measures. This commit therefore reduced rcutorture's forward-progress
kthread's priority in those cases.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
There are debug checks in some environments that will complain if the
duration of a bh-disabled region of code exceeds about 50 milliseconds.
Because rcu_read_delay() can produce a 50-millisecond delay and because
there could be up to eight reader segments with such delays, this commit
limits the maximum delay to 10 milliseconds if either interrupts or
softirqs are disabled.
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
RCU now takes certain actions 100 and 200 milliseconds into a grace period
by default, but rcutorture only runs RCU read-side critical sections
with durations up to 50 milliseconds. This commit therefore increases
test coverage by increasing the maximum critical-section duration to
300 milliseconds. Note that the existing code automatically dials down
the probability of long delays based on the maximum duration, which means
that this change should not significantly change the rate of execution
of RCU read-side critical sections.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
If rcutorture is run on a quiet system with the rcutorture.stutter module
parameter set high, then there can legitimately be an extended period
during which no RCU forward progress takes place. This can result
in false-positive no-forward-progress splats. This commit therefore
makes rcu_torture_fwd_prog() create a self-propagating RCU callback
to ensure that grace periods are in progress for the duration of the
forward-progress test.
Note that the RCU flavor under test must define ->call(), ->sync(),
and ->cb_barrier() for this self-propagating callback to be created.
If one or more of those rcu_torture_ops fields are NULL, then the
rcu_torture_fwd_prog() function will silently proceed without creating
the self-propagating callback.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Some of the Linux kernel's RCU implementations provide several mechanisms
to promote forward progress that operate over different timeframes.
This commit therefore causes rcu_torture_fwd_prog() to vary the duration
of its forward-progress testing in order to test each such mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In a too-short test, random delays can cause each attempt to do
forward-progress testing to fail to complete, thus resulting in
spurious splats. This commit therefore requires at least five tries
before complaining about rcutorture runs that failed to produce at
least one valid forward-progress testing attempt. Note that actual
forward-progress failures will splat regardless of the number of tries.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Currently, rcutorture relies solely on the progress of
rcu_torture_writer() to judge grace-period forward progress. In theory,
this is the gold standard of forward progress, but in practice rcutorture
separately detects and reports rcu_torture_writer() stalls. This commit
therefore adds the grace-period sequence number (when provided) to the
judgment of grace-period forward progress, which makes it easier to
distinguish between failure of actual grace periods to progress on the
one hand and downstream forward-progress failures on the other.
For example, given this change, if rcu_torture_writer() stalls,
but rcu_torture_fwd_prog() does not complain, then the grace-period
computation is working, which is a hint that the failure lies in callback
processing, wakeup of the rcu_torture_writer() kthread, or similar.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit adds a kthread that loops going into and out of RCU
read-side critical sections, but also including a cond_resched(),
optionally guarded by a check of need_resched(), in that same loop.
This commit relies solely on rcu_torture_writer() progress to judge
the forward progress of grace periods.
Note that Tasks RCU and SRCU are exempted from forward-progress testing
due their (intentionally) less-robust forward-progress guarantees.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
