Commit 350779a29f ("powerpc: Handle most loads and stores in
instruction emulation code", 2017-08-30) changed the register usage
in get_vr and put_vr with the aim of leaving the register number in
r3 untouched on return. Unfortunately, r6 was not a good choice, as
the callers as of 350779a29f store a MSR value in r6. Then, in
commit c22435a5f3 ("powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores
correctly when regs not live", 2017-08-30), the saving and restoring
of the MSR got moved into get_vr and put_vr. Either way, the effect
is that we put a value in MSR that only has the 0x3f8 bits non-zero,
meaning that we are switching to 32-bit mode. That leads to a crash
like this:
Unable to handle kernel paging request for instruction fetch
Faulting instruction address: 0x0007bea0
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#12]
LE SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA PowerNV
Modules linked in: vmx_crypto binfmt_misc ip_tables x_tables autofs4 crc32c_vpmsum
CPU: 6 PID: 32659 Comm: trashy_testcase Tainted: G D 4.13.0-rc2-00313-gf3026f57e6ed-dirty #23
task: c000000f1bb9e780 task.stack: c000000f1ba98000
NIP: 000000000007bea0 LR: c00000000007b054 CTR: c00000000007be70
REGS: c000000f1ba9b960 TRAP: 0400 Tainted: G D (4.13.0-rc2-00313-gf3026f57e6ed-dirty)
MSR: 10000000400010a1 <HV,ME,IR,LE> CR: 48000228 XER: 00000000
CFAR: c00000000007be74 SOFTE: 1
GPR00: c00000000007b054 c000000f1ba9bbe0 c000000000e6e000 000000000000001d
GPR04: c000000f1ba9bc00 c00000000007be70 00000000000000e8 9000000002009033
GPR08: 0000000002000000 100000000282f033 000000000b0a0900 0000000000001009
GPR12: 0000000000000000 c00000000fd42100 0706050303020100 a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5
GPR16: 2e2e2e2e2e2de70c 2e2e2e2e2e2e2e2d 0000000000ff00ff 0606040202020000
GPR20: 000000000000005b ffffffffffffffff 0000000003020100 0000000000000000
GPR24: c000000f1ab90020 c000000f1ba9bc00 0000000000000001 0000000000000001
GPR28: c000000f1ba9bc90 c000000f1ba9bea0 000000000b0a0908 0000000000000001
NIP [000000000007bea0] 0x7bea0
LR [c00000000007b054] emulate_loadstore+0x1044/0x1280
Call Trace:
[c000000f1ba9bbe0] [c000000000076b80] analyse_instr+0x60/0x34f0 (unreliable)
[c000000f1ba9bc70] [c00000000007b7ec] emulate_step+0x23c/0x544
[c000000f1ba9bce0] [c000000000053424] arch_uprobe_skip_sstep+0x24/0x40
[c000000f1ba9bd00] [c00000000024b2f8] uprobe_notify_resume+0x598/0xba0
[c000000f1ba9be00] [c00000000001c284] do_notify_resume+0xd4/0xf0
[c000000f1ba9be30] [c00000000000bd44] ret_from_except_lite+0x70/0x74
Instruction dump:
XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
---[ end trace a7ae7a7f3e0256b5 ]---
To fix this, we just revert to using r3 as before, since the callers
don't rely on r3 being left unmodified.
Fortunately, this can't be triggered by a misaligned load or store,
because vector loads and stores truncate misaligned addresses rather
than taking an alignment interrupt. It can be triggered using
uprobes.
Fixes: 350779a29f ("powerpc: Handle most loads and stores in instruction emulation code")
Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Tested-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the
relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load
or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or
writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step().
Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get
preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access.
If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the
thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers
would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would
never be seen by the user process.
Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page
fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code
calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers.
To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured
so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register
contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either
sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct.
Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the
CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables
preemption and then copies the register image to memory.
If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not
use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the
relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to
emulate the instruction.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
This extends the instruction emulation infrastructure in sstep.c to
handle all the load and store instructions defined in the Power ISA
v3.0, except for the atomic memory operations, ldmx (which was never
implemented), lfdp/stfdp, and the vector element load/stores.
The instructions added are:
Integer loads and stores: lbarx, lharx, lqarx, stbcx., sthcx., stqcx.,
lq, stq.
VSX loads and stores: lxsiwzx, lxsiwax, stxsiwx, lxvx, lxvl, lxvll,
lxvdsx, lxvwsx, stxvx, stxvl, stxvll, lxsspx, lxsdx, stxsspx, stxsdx,
lxvw4x, lxsibzx, lxvh8x, lxsihzx, lxvb16x, stxvw4x, stxsibx, stxvh8x,
stxsihx, stxvb16x, lxsd, lxssp, lxv, stxsd, stxssp, stxv.
These instructions are handled both in the analyse_instr phase and in
the emulate_step phase.
The code for lxvd2ux and stxvd2ux has been taken out, as those
instructions were never implemented in any processor and have been
taken out of the architecture, and their opcodes have been reused for
other instructions in POWER9 (lxvb16x and stxvb16x).
The emulation for the VSX loads and stores uses helper functions
which don't access registers or memory directly, which can hopefully
be reused by KVM later.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
This macro is taken from s390, and allows more flexibility in
changing exception table format.
mpe: Put it in ppc_asm.h and only define one version using
stringinfy_in_c(). Add some empty definitions and headers to keep the
selftests happy.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated,
we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and
the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put
in tools/testing/selftest.
One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the
VSX register definitions - the kernel uses vsrX whereas gcc uses
vsX.
Change the kernel to match userspace.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated,
we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and
the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put
in tools/testing/selftest.
One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the
VMX register definitions - the kernel uses vrX whereas both gcc and
glibc use vX.
Change the kernel to match userspace.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
These macros are using integers where they could be using logical
names since they take registers.
We are going to enforce this soon, so fix these up now.
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Anything that uses a constructed instruction (ie. from ppc-opcode.h),
need to use the new R0 macro, as %r0 is not going to work.
Also convert usages of macros where we are just determining an offset
(usually for a load/store), like:
std r14,STK_REG(r14)(r1)
Can't use STK_REG(r14) as %r14 doesn't work in the STK_REG macro since
it's just calculating an offset.
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro.
Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set.
Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion
of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server
processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions
used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between
l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx
and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7).
The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the
effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for
user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present.
For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks
that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility
set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain
valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the
FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S.
Instructions supported now include:
* Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions,
and lmw/stmw
* Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.)
* Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.)
* Compare instructions
* Rotate and mask instructions
* Shift instructions
* Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.)
* Condition register logical instructions
* mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw]
* isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio
* Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst)
The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but
they appear not to be ever used in C code.
This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements
because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is
easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal.
If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint
interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction
is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the
reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make
forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can
return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without
losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes,
or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The
other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions
in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range
of integer instructions.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
