forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
653cd284a8
Recently, ops->init() and ops->dump() of all actions were modified to always obtain tcf_lock when accessing private action state. Actions that don't depend on tcf_lock for synchronization with their data path use non-bh locking API. However, tcf_lock is also used to protect rate estimator stats in softirq context by timer callback. Change ops->init() and ops->dump() of all actions to disable bh when using tcf_lock to prevent deadlock reported by following lockdep warning: [ 105.470398] ================================ [ 105.475014] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 105.479628] 4.18.0-rc8+ #664 Not tainted [ 105.483897] -------------------------------- [ 105.488511] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 105.494871] swapper/16/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes: [ 105.500449] 00000000f86c012e (&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: est_fetch_counters+0x3c/0xa0 [ 105.509696] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 105.514925] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 [ 105.519022] tcf_bpf_init+0x579/0x820 [act_bpf] [ 105.523990] tcf_action_init_1+0x4e4/0x660 [ 105.528518] tcf_action_init+0x1ce/0x2d0 [ 105.532880] tcf_exts_validate+0x1d8/0x200 [ 105.537416] fl_change+0x55a/0x268b [cls_flower] [ 105.542469] tc_new_tfilter+0x748/0xa20 [ 105.546738] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x56a/0x6d0 [ 105.551268] netlink_rcv_skb+0x18d/0x200 [ 105.555628] netlink_unicast+0x2d0/0x370 [ 105.559990] netlink_sendmsg+0x3b9/0x6a0 [ 105.564349] sock_sendmsg+0x6b/0x80 [ 105.568271] ___sys_sendmsg+0x4a1/0x520 [ 105.572547] __sys_sendmsg+0xd7/0x150 [ 105.576655] do_syscall_64+0x72/0x2c0 [ 105.580757] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 105.586243] irq event stamp: 489296 [ 105.590084] hardirqs last enabled at (489296): [<ffffffffb507e639>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40 [ 105.599765] hardirqs last disabled at (489295): [<ffffffffb507e745>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x15/0x50 [ 105.609277] softirqs last enabled at (489292): [<ffffffffb413a6a3>] irq_enter+0x83/0xa0 [ 105.618001] softirqs last disabled at (489293): [<ffffffffb413a800>] irq_exit+0x140/0x190 [ 105.626813] other info that might help us debug this: [ 105.633976] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 105.640526] CPU0 [ 105.643325] ---- [ 105.646125] lock(&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock); [ 105.650747] <Interrupt> [ 105.653717] lock(&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock); [ 105.658514] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 105.665349] 1 lock held by swapper/16/0: [ 105.669629] #0: 00000000a640ad99 ((&est->timer)){+.-.}, at: call_timer_fn+0x10b/0x550 [ 105.678200] stack backtrace: [ 105.683194] CPU: 16 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/16 Not tainted 4.18.0-rc8+ #664 [ 105.690249] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-2028TP-DECR/X10DRT-P, BIOS 2.0b 03/30/2017 [ 105.698626] Call Trace: [ 105.701421] <IRQ> [ 105.703791] dump_stack+0x92/0xeb [ 105.707461] print_usage_bug+0x336/0x34c [ 105.711744] mark_lock+0x7c9/0x980 [ 105.715500] ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x2e0/0x2e0 [ 105.721424] ? check_usage_forwards+0x230/0x230 [ 105.726315] __lock_acquire+0x923/0x26f0 [ 105.730597] ? debug_show_all_locks+0x240/0x240 [ 105.735478] ? mark_lock+0x493/0x980 [ 105.739412] ? check_chain_key+0x140/0x1f0 [ 105.743861] ? __lock_acquire+0x836/0x26f0 [ 105.748323] ? lock_acquire+0x12e/0x290 [ 105.752516] lock_acquire+0x12e/0x290 [ 105.756539] ? est_fetch_counters+0x3c/0xa0 [ 105.761084] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 [ 105.765099] ? est_fetch_counters+0x3c/0xa0 [ 105.769633] est_fetch_counters+0x3c/0xa0 [ 105.773995] est_timer+0x87/0x390 [ 105.777670] ? est_fetch_counters+0xa0/0xa0 [ 105.782210] ? lock_acquire+0x12e/0x290 [ 105.786410] call_timer_fn+0x161/0x550 [ 105.790512] ? est_fetch_counters+0xa0/0xa0 [ 105.795055] ? del_timer_sync+0xd0/0xd0 [ 105.799249] ? __lock_is_held+0x93/0x110 [ 105.803531] ? mark_held_locks+0x20/0xe0 [ 105.807813] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40 [ 105.812525] ? est_fetch_counters+0xa0/0xa0 [ 105.817069] ? est_fetch_counters+0xa0/0xa0 [ 105.821610] run_timer_softirq+0x3c4/0x9f0 [ 105.826064] ? lock_acquire+0x12e/0x290 [ 105.830257] ? __bpf_trace_timer_class+0x10/0x10 [ 105.835237] ? __lock_is_held+0x25/0x110 [ 105.839517] __do_softirq+0x11d/0x7bf [ 105.843542] irq_exit+0x140/0x190 [ 105.847208] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0xac/0x3b0 [ 105.852182] apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 [ 105.856628] </IRQ> [ 105.859081] RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0xd8/0x4d0 [ 105.864395] Code: 46 ff 48 89 44 24 08 0f 1f 44 00 00 31 ff e8 cf ec 46 ff 80 7c 24 07 00 0f 85 1d 02 00 00 e8 9f 90 4b ff fb 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 <4c> 8b 6c 24 08 4d 29 fd 0f 80 36 03 00 00 4c 89 e8 48 ba cf f7 53 [ 105.884288] RSP: 0018:ffff8803ad94fd20 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 [ 105.892494] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffe8fb300829c0 RCX: ffffffffb41e19e1 [ 105.899988] RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: dffffc0000000000 RDI: ffff8803ad9358ac [ 105.907503] RBP: ffffffffb6636300 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 105.914997] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000004 [ 105.922487] R13: ffffffffb6636140 R14: ffffffffb66362d8 R15: 000000188d36091b [ 105.929988] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x141/0x2d0 [ 105.935232] do_idle+0x28e/0x320 [ 105.938817] ? arch_cpu_idle_exit+0x40/0x40 [ 105.943361] ? mark_lock+0x8c1/0x980 [ 105.947295] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x32/0x60 [ 105.952619] cpu_startup_entry+0xc2/0xd0 [ 105.956900] ? cpu_in_idle+0x20/0x20 [ 105.960830] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x32/0x60 [ 105.966146] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x141/0x2d0 [ 105.971391] start_secondary+0x2b5/0x360 [ 105.975669] ? set_cpu_sibling_map+0x1330/0x1330 [ 105.980654] secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 Taking tcf_lock in sample action with bh disabled causes lockdep to issue a warning regarding possible irq lock inversion dependency between tcf_lock, and psample_groups_lock that is taken when holding tcf_lock in sample init: [ 162.108959] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [ 162.116386] CPU0 CPU1 [ 162.121277] ---- ---- [ 162.126162] lock(psample_groups_lock); [ 162.130447] local_irq_disable(); [ 162.136772] lock(&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock); [ 162.143957] lock(psample_groups_lock); [ 162.150813] <Interrupt> [ 162.153808] lock(&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock); [ 162.158608] *** DEADLOCK *** In order to prevent potential lock inversion dependency between tcf_lock and psample_groups_lock, extract call to psample_group_get() from tcf_lock protected section in sample action init function. Fixes: |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| act_api.c | ||
| act_bpf.c | ||
| act_connmark.c | ||
| act_csum.c | ||
| act_gact.c | ||
| act_ife.c | ||
| act_ipt.c | ||
| act_meta_mark.c | ||
| act_meta_skbprio.c | ||
| act_meta_skbtcindex.c | ||
| act_mirred.c | ||
| act_nat.c | ||
| act_pedit.c | ||
| act_police.c | ||
| act_sample.c | ||
| act_simple.c | ||
| act_skbedit.c | ||
| act_skbmod.c | ||
| act_tunnel_key.c | ||
| act_vlan.c | ||
| cls_api.c | ||
| cls_basic.c | ||
| cls_bpf.c | ||
| cls_cgroup.c | ||
| cls_flow.c | ||
| cls_flower.c | ||
| cls_fw.c | ||
| cls_matchall.c | ||
| cls_route.c | ||
| cls_rsvp.c | ||
| cls_rsvp.h | ||
| cls_rsvp6.c | ||
| cls_tcindex.c | ||
| cls_u32.c | ||
| em_canid.c | ||
| em_cmp.c | ||
| em_ipset.c | ||
| em_ipt.c | ||
| em_meta.c | ||
| em_nbyte.c | ||
| em_text.c | ||
| em_u32.c | ||
| ematch.c | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Makefile | ||
| sch_api.c | ||
| sch_atm.c | ||
| sch_blackhole.c | ||
| sch_cake.c | ||
| sch_cbq.c | ||
| sch_cbs.c | ||
| sch_choke.c | ||
| sch_codel.c | ||
| sch_drr.c | ||
| sch_dsmark.c | ||
| sch_etf.c | ||
| sch_fifo.c | ||
| sch_fq_codel.c | ||
| sch_fq.c | ||
| sch_generic.c | ||
| sch_gred.c | ||
| sch_hfsc.c | ||
| sch_hhf.c | ||
| sch_htb.c | ||
| sch_ingress.c | ||
| sch_mq.c | ||
| sch_mqprio.c | ||
| sch_multiq.c | ||
| sch_netem.c | ||
| sch_pie.c | ||
| sch_plug.c | ||
| sch_prio.c | ||
| sch_qfq.c | ||
| sch_red.c | ||
| sch_sfb.c | ||
| sch_sfq.c | ||
| sch_skbprio.c | ||
| sch_tbf.c | ||
| sch_teql.c | ||