Gustavo A. R. Silva 8128d3aac0 pstore/ram: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member ... The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200309202327.GA8813@embeddedor Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>		2020-03-09 14:45:40 -07:00
..
ftrace.c
inode.c	pstore: pstore_ftrace_seq_next should increase position index	2020-02-27 08:04:59 -08:00
internal.h
Kconfig
Makefile
platform.c
pmsg.c
ram_core.c	pstore/ram: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member	2020-03-09 14:45:40 -07:00
ram.c