kernel_optimize_test/arch
Grzegorz Janoszka 40d8b89b06 [PATCH] arch/i386/pci/irq.c - new VIA chipsets (fwd)
I use 2.6.15.6 Linux kernel and found some problems. I have about 100
Linux boxes (all with the same (binary the same) kernel). Last time I have
upgraded all those boxes from 2.4.32 to 2.6.15.6 (first 2.6.15.1, next .2,
.4 and .6) and I have found some problems on VIA based PC's. Probably the
reason of this is that some VIA chipsets are unrecognized by IRQ router.

In line 586 there is: /* FIXME: add new ones for 8233/5 */

There were only a few of chipsets ID's there, some of my VIA chipsets were
not present and kernel used default IRQ router.

I have added three entries, so that the code looks like:

        case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C596:
        case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686:
        case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8231:
        case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8233A:
        case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8235:
        case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237:
        case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237_SATA:
                /* FIXME: add new ones for 8233/5 */
                r->name = "VIA";
                r->get = pirq_via_get;
                r->set = pirq_via_set;
                return 1;
        }

The kernel goes fine but I haven't testes it for weeks, I'm just a moment
after reboot :)
One thing is different (better?):
Using previus kernel I had:
PCI: Via IRQ fixup for 0000:00:0f.1, from 255 to 0
now I have:
PCI: Via IRQ fixup for 0000:00:0f.1, from 255 to 11

Maybe it is good idea to add there some more VIA chipsets?
The ones I have added seem to be OK.

From: Grzegorz Janoszka <Grzegorz@Janoszka.pl>
Acked-by: Martin Mares <mj@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2006-04-14 12:25:25 -07:00
..
alpha [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00
arm [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00
arm26 [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00
cris [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00
frv [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00
h8300 [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00
i386 [PATCH] arch/i386/pci/irq.c - new VIA chipsets (fwd) 2006-04-14 12:25:25 -07:00
ia64 Merge branch 'tee' of git://brick.kernel.dk/data/git/linux-2.6-block 2006-04-14 09:02:07 -07:00
m32r [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00
m68k [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00
m68knommu [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00
mips [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00
parisc [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00
powerpc [PATCH] splice: add support for sys_tee() 2006-04-11 15:51:17 +02:00
ppc kbuild: use relative path to -I 2006-04-04 16:56:10 +02:00
s390 [PATCH] arch/s390/Makefile: remove -finline-limit=10000 2006-04-11 06:18:39 -07:00
sh [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00
sh64 [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00
sparc Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sam/kbuild 2006-04-11 06:41:02 -07:00
sparc64 [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00
um [PATCH] uml: avoid warnings for diffent names for an unsigned quadword 2006-04-11 06:18:37 -07:00
v850 [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00
x86_64 [PATCH] x86_64: Fix embarassing typo in mmconfig bus check 2006-04-11 06:38:57 -07:00
xtensa [PATCH] No arch-specific strpbrk implementations 2006-04-11 06:18:40 -07:00