kernel_optimize_test/include/asm-i386/mach-visws/do_timer.h
Tom Duffy 6c79d7260a [PATCH] Make visws compile again
In file included from linux-2.6.13-rc5/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_pit.c:20:
linux-2.6.13-rc5/include/asm-i386/mach-visws/do_timer.h: In function `do_timer_overflow':
linux-2.6.13-rc5/include/asm-i386/mach-visws/do_timer.h:32: error: `i8259A_lock' undeclared (first use in this function)
linux-2.6.13-rc5/include/asm-i386/mach-visws/do_timer.h:32: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
linux-2.6.13-rc5/include/asm-i386/mach-visws/do_timer.h:32: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[3]: *** [arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_pit.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [arch/i386/kernel/timers] Error 2
make[1]: *** [arch/i386/kernel] Error 2
make: *** [_all] Error 2

Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <thomas.duffy.99@alumni.brown.edu>
Cc: Andrey Panin <pazke@orbita1.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-08-07 10:00:38 -07:00

54 lines
1.2 KiB
C

/* defines for inline arch setup functions */
#include <asm/fixmap.h>
#include <asm/i8259.h>
#include "cobalt.h"
static inline void do_timer_interrupt_hook(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
/* Clear the interrupt */
co_cpu_write(CO_CPU_STAT,co_cpu_read(CO_CPU_STAT) & ~CO_STAT_TIMEINTR);
do_timer(regs);
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
update_process_times(user_mode(regs));
#endif
/*
* In the SMP case we use the local APIC timer interrupt to do the
* profiling, except when we simulate SMP mode on a uniprocessor
* system, in that case we have to call the local interrupt handler.
*/
#ifndef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
profile_tick(CPU_PROFILING, regs);
#else
if (!using_apic_timer)
smp_local_timer_interrupt(regs);
#endif
}
static inline int do_timer_overflow(int count)
{
int i;
spin_lock(&i8259A_lock);
/*
* This is tricky when I/O APICs are used;
* see do_timer_interrupt().
*/
i = inb(0x20);
spin_unlock(&i8259A_lock);
/* assumption about timer being IRQ0 */
if (i & 0x01) {
/*
* We cannot detect lost timer interrupts ...
* well, that's why we call them lost, don't we? :)
* [hmm, on the Pentium and Alpha we can ... sort of]
*/
count -= LATCH;
} else {
printk("do_slow_gettimeoffset(): hardware timer problem?\n");
}
return count;
}