[ Upstream commit ee1444b5e1df4155b591d0d9b1e72853a99ea861 ]
The W=2 build pointed out that the code wasn't initializing all the
variables in the dim_cq_moder declarations with the struct initializers.
The net change here is zero since these structs were already static
const globals and were initialized with zeros by the compiler, but
removing compiler warnings has value in and of itself.
lib/dim/net_dim.c: At top level:
lib/dim/net_dim.c:54:9: warning: missing initializer for field ‘comps’ of ‘const struct dim_cq_moder’ [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
54 | NET_DIM_RX_EQE_PROFILES,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from lib/dim/net_dim.c:6:
./include/linux/dim.h:45:13: note: ‘comps’ declared here
45 | u16 comps;
| ^~~~~
and repeats for the tx struct, and once you fix the comps entry then
the cq_period_mode field needs the same treatment.
Use the commonly accepted style to indicate to the compiler that we
know what we're doing, and add a comma at the end of each struct
initializer to clean up the issue, and use explicit initializers
for the fields we are initializing which makes the compiler happy.
While here and fixing these lines, clean up the code slightly with
a fix for the super long lines by removing the word "_MODERATION" from a
couple defines only used in this file.
Fixes: f8be17b81d ("lib/dim: Fix -Wunused-const-variable warnings")
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220507011038.14568-1-jesse.brandeburg@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
