Kyle McMartin d61e7380b4 drm: edid revision 0 is valid ... edid->revision == 0 should be valid (at least, so the error message indicates. :) and wikipedia seems to indicate that EDID 1.0 existed. We can dump the entire check, since edid->revision is a u8, so it can't ever be less than 0. Marko reports in RH bz#476735 that his monitor claims to be EDID 1.0, and therefore hits the check and is stuck at 800x600 because of it. Reported-by: Marko Ristola <marko.ristola@kolumbus.fi> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>		2009-02-25 14:47:05 +10:00
..
drm	drm: edid revision 0 is valid	2009-02-25 14:47:05 +10:00
Makefile	drm: reorganise drm tree to be more future proof.	2008-07-14 10:45:01 +10:00